Military hearing officer deciding whether to recommend court-martial for Pentagon leaker (2024)

BEDFORD, Massachusetts (AP) — A Massachusetts Air National Guard member who pleaded guilty in March to federal crimes for leaking highly classified military documents appeared Tuesday before a military hearing officer who will recommend whether the guardsman should face a court-martial.

Jack Teixeira, of North Dighton, Massachusetts, is facing three charges in the military justice system: one alleging he failed to obey a lawful order and two counts of obstructing justice.

Capt. Stephanie Evans said at Tuesday’s hearing that a court-martial was appropriate given that obeying orders “is at the absolute core of everything we do in the U.S. military” and that Texeira acted with “malicious intent to cover his tracks.” But one of Teixeira’s attorneys, Maj. Luke Gilhooly, argued that further action would amount to prosecuting him twice for the same offense.

Teixeira was arrested just over a year ago in the most consequential national security leak in years. He pleaded guilty on March 4 to six counts of willful retention and transmission of national defense information under a deal with prosecutors that calls for him to serve at least 11 years in prison.

RELATED COVERAGE

Pentagon leaker Jack Teixeira to face a military court-martial, Air Force says

Air National Guard unit that was suspended after classified documents leak will restart mission

Referring to that agreement, Gilhooly said the government has now taken its “big feast of evidence” from the criminal courthouse and walked it “down the street here to Hanscom Air Force Base to get their own pound of flesh.”

Dressed in military uniform, Teixeira did not speak at the hearing other than to indicate he understood the proceedings, and family members in attendance declined to comment. In court, he admitted to illegally collecting some of the nation’s most sensitive secrets and sharing them with other users on Discord, a social media platform popular with online gamers.

Teixeira, who was part of the 102nd Intelligence Wing at Otis Air National Guard Base in Massachusetts, worked as a cyber transport systems specialist, essentially an information technology specialist responsible for military communications networks.

On Tuesday, military prosecutors sought to include evidence they said showed Teixeira used Discord to ask others to delete his messages as the basis for one of the obstruction of justice charges. But his attorneys objected, saying they wanted the raw data that purportedly connected Teixeira to the messages.

“The government wants you to take a leap of logic and connect the dots when there are no dots,” Lt. Col. Bradley Poronsky said.

The hearing officer, Lt. Col. Michael Raming, initially agreed. He said he wouldn’t consider the documents in making his recommendation, but later said he would consider an amended version submitted by prosecutors. Raming’s recommendations, to be issued at a later date, will be sent to Maj. Gen. Daniel DeVoe, who will decide whether the case should continue.

Until both sides made brief closing statements, the three-hour hearing shed little light on the case as neither Teixeira’s attorneys nor military prosecutors called any witnesses. Instead, they spent the bulk of the three-hour hearing discussing objections raised by Teixeira’s lawyers to some of the documents prosecutors submitted as evidence.

The military charges accuse Teixeira of disobeying orders to stop accessing sensitive documents. The obstruction of justice charges allege that he disposed of an iPad, computer hard drive and iPhone, and instructed others to delete his messages on Discord before his arrest.

“His actions to conceal and destroy messages became egregious,” Evans said.

Authorities in the criminal case said Teixeira first typed out classified documents he accessed and then began sharing photographs of files that bore SECRET and TOP SECRET markings. The leak exposed to the world unvarnished secret assessments of Russia’s war in Ukraine, including information about troop movements in Ukraine and the provision of supplies and equipment to Ukrainian troops. Teixeira also admitted posting information about a U.S. adversary’s plans to harm U.S. forces serving overseas.

The stunning security breach raised alarm over America’s ability to protect its most closely guarded secrets and forced the Biden administration to scramble to try to contain the diplomatic and military fallout. The leaks embarrassed the Pentagon, which tightened controls to safeguard classified information and disciplined members it found had intentionally failed to take required action about Teixeira’s suspicious behavior.

____

This story has been updated to correct the spelling of the last name of Lt. Col. Michael Raming and to show Maj. Luke Gilhooly, not Lt. Col. Poronsky, made the comments about double jeopardy.

Military hearing officer deciding whether to recommend court-martial for Pentagon leaker (2024)

FAQs

Which type of courts martial Cannot be used to try an officer? ›

A summary court-martial is designed to dispose of minor offenses. Only enlisted soldiers may be tried by summary court-martial. A single officer presides over the hearing. The accused has no right to counsel but may hire an attorney to represent him.

What do soldiers get court martialed for? ›

Offences such as mutiny, murder, sexual offences, serious assaults, drug offences, or offences where the maximum punishment exceeds a 7-year prison term will be heard by court martial. Below this 7-year threshold the accused is dealt with by their commanding officer in what is known as a summary trial.

What type of court-martial usually consists of a military judge and three court-martial members? ›

A special court-martial is a federal criminal trial composed of a military judge and at least three jury members (although the accused can also choose to be tried by judge alone).

What are the names of the two courts that hear cases involving military personnel? ›

The military court system includes military courts-martial; a Criminal Court of Appeals for each branch of the armed services; and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (CAAF), which has discretionary appellate jurisdiction over all military cases.

Who decides which type of court-martial to award? ›

Initiating Courts-Martial: The convening authority decides whether to refer charges to a court martial and, if so, which type of court-martial is appropriate. Selecting Members: The convening authority selects the court-martial panel members, ensuring a fair and impartial panel.

What is the burden of proof at court-martial? ›

Burden of proof

Reasonable doubt as to the guilt of the accused must be resolved in favor of the accused. In other words, an accused service member must be "given the benefit of the doubt;” or, put more simply: there must be no reasonable chance or likelihood–per the evidence and proceedings–of the accused's innocence.

How to determine special court-martial convening authority? ›

Who Can Convene a Special Courts-Martial? Officers with the power to convene a special court-martial are known as special court-martial convening authorities. These are 0-6 level commanders, although any officer who can convene a general court-martial may also convene a special court-martial.

How bad is a court-martial? ›

No matter how long you planned on serving in the military, no one wants to end their military career based on a court-martial conviction. If convicted, court-martial punishments could include punitive discharge, jail time, and loss of rank, pay and/or benefits.

What are the requirements for a court-martial? ›

There are three general prerequisites that must be met for courts-martial jurisdiction to vest (1) jurisdiction over the offense, (2) personal jurisdiction over the accused, and (3) a properly convened and composed court-martial.

How to find out if someone is lying about military service? ›

One of the most accurate ways to verify military service records is through a FOIA request letter. Public military service records are readily available to citizens just like other pieces of government information. Most public record request don't require personal information or explanation from your part.

What is the maximum punishment for special court-martial? ›

Maximum Punishment

Confinement up to 1 year, Hard labor without confinement up to 3 months, Two-thirds forfeiture of pay per month for up to 1 year, and. Enlisted members may be reduced to the lowest enlisted pay grade.

What happens if a civilian hits a soldier? ›

Under the UCMJ, the act may be considered not only an offense against the individual but against military authority as well. The penalties for assaulting a US soldier can be severe and might include fines, imprisonment, or both. The table below summarizes potential civilian charges and the associated penalties.

Can an officer go to a special court-martial? ›

Commissioned officers and warrant officers may not be reduced in rank. Additionally, officers cannot be confined by a special court-martial or dismissed from the service. For that reason, officers are not typically tried by special court-martial.

Can civilians be tried in a court-martial? ›

In 2006, Congress quietly amended the UCMJ to provide that civilians serving with or accompanying an armed force in the field in time of declared war or a contingency operation would be subject to trial by court-martial.

What types of cases do courts-martial deal with? ›

A court martial is a legal proceeding for military members that is similar to a civilian court trial. It is usually reserved for serious criminal offenses like felonies. For less serious criminal offenses or breaches of military decorum and regulations, a Non-Judicial Punishment (NJP) is usually held.

Which civilians may be tried in a court-martial? ›

Civilian Employees Of The US Army, Navy, And Air Force

As such, these persons serving with or accompanying a staff of the US Armed Forces personnel in the field may be subjected to a court-martial, when necessary.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Moshe Kshlerin

Last Updated:

Views: 6608

Rating: 4.7 / 5 (57 voted)

Reviews: 88% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Moshe Kshlerin

Birthday: 1994-01-25

Address: Suite 609 315 Lupita Unions, Ronnieburgh, MI 62697

Phone: +2424755286529

Job: District Education Designer

Hobby: Yoga, Gunsmithing, Singing, 3D printing, Nordic skating, Soapmaking, Juggling

Introduction: My name is Moshe Kshlerin, I am a gleaming, attractive, outstanding, pleasant, delightful, outstanding, famous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.